Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Mark Tyson v. Robert Foster, et al
as 13-12160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK WADE TYSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT FOSTER, STEPHEN BLEDSOE and JOHN ROCKWELL
Downs Jr. v. Foster et al
as 3:2013cv00366
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Downs Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Foster, Angela Corey, Stephen Siegel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Corey et al
as 3:2013cv00326
Plaintiff:
Shawn Daniels
Defendant:
Angela B. Corey, Donna G. Thurson, Robert Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyson v. Foster et al
as 3:2013cv00301
Plaintiff:
Mark Wade Tyson
Defendant:
Robert Foster, Stephen Bledsoe and John Rockwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coates, Jr. v. Seagraves et al
as 3:2013cv00270
Plaintiff:
Joseph Arthur Coates, Jr.
Defendant:
Tommy Seagraves, Nye, Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Foster et al
as 3:2013cv00142
Plaintiff:
Orvel Lloyd
Defendant:
Robert Foster, State Attorney and Sheriff of Nassau County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Judge Robert Foster et al
as 3:2012cv00991
Plaintiff:
James Lee McGee
Defendant:
Judge Robert Foster, State Attorney Angela Corey and Assistant State Attorney John Kalinowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Foster et al
as 8:2011cv02374
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Defendant:
Robert Foster and Sean T. Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Foster et al
as 1:2009cv22431
Plaintiff:
Chester Eugene Weaver
Defendant:
Robert Foster and Grandville Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver et al v. Geiger et al
as 3:2007cv01205
Plaintiff:
Chester Weaver, Sr. and Chester Weaver, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Geiger, W. J. O'Leary, C. Wate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
