Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Langford v. Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05141
Defendant:
Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc., Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Erika Clarke Birg and others
Plaintiff:
Moses Langford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langford v. Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04327
Defendant:
Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc., Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Erika Clarke Birg and others
Plaintiff:
Moses Langford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2019cv04196
Plaintiff:
Jessica Freire, Norman Allen Thompson, Kathy Euliano and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Mondy v. Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc.
as 1:2018cv04989
Plaintiff:
Michael O. Mondy
Defendant:
J. P. Boulee, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. DOWDEN et al
as 7:2018cv00123
Defendant:
KATRINA HALL, GARY VOWELL, KEVIN HUTTO and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SINTEL KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. SCARBOROUGH et al
as 7:2018cv00122
Defendant:
LT MONTGOMERY, KIM SCHWALLS, SGT LYNN PARKINSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SINTEL KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. DOZIER et al
as 7:2018cv00121
Defendant:
KATRINA HALL, GARY VOWELL, KEVIN HUTTO and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SINTEL KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN-BEY v. BERRY et al
as 1:2018cv00149
Defendant:
WALTER BERRY, LISA ST JOHN, BENJIE NOBLES and others
Plaintiff:
KURTIS LEE BROWN-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. SCARBOROUGH et al
as 5:2018cv00280
Plaintiff:
IRIS NEAL
Defendant:
DAVID SCARBOROUGH and LEE SCARBOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NeoMed, Inc. v. Scarborough et al
as 1:2018cv00945
Plaintiff:
NeoMed, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert D. Scarborough, Jr. , Michael Scarborough and Innovative Medical Specialties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
