Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Sharma v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2010cv21704
Plaintiff:
Harsh Sharma
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Paula A Scholz, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Scholz Aluminium GmbH v. Gearbulk, Inc. et al
as 8:2009cv01330
Defendant:
Gearbulk, Inc. and Arrow Terminals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scholz Aluminium GmbH
Not Classified By Court:
Terrence M. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scholz Design Inc v. Bell-Harrison Inc
as 3:2009cv00076
Plaintiff:
Scholz Design Inc, Scholz Design Inc and Scholz Design Inc
Defendant:
Bell-Harrison Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hamner et al v. Scholz Design, Inc. et al
as 7:2009cv01050
Plaintiff:
Victor E. Hamner and Shannon Hamner
Defendant:
Scholz Design, Inc., Scholz Design, Inc., Christopher E. Gibson and others
Counter Claimant:
Scholz Design, Inc., Scholz Design, Inc., Christopher E. Gibson and others
Counter Defendant:
Victor E. Hamner and Shannon Hamner
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Scholz Design, Inc. v. Cloud et al
as 4:2009cv00466
Plaintiff:
Scholz Design, Inc.
Defendant:
William T. Cloud, Jr. and Mike Johnson Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scholz v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP et al
as 6:2008cv02096
Plaintiff:
Shirley Scholz, Shirley Scholz and Shirley Scholz
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Astrazeneca LP, Astrazeneca, AB and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Scholz Design, Inc. v. Barber et al
as 1:2007cv02197
Plaintiff:
Scholz Design, Inc. and Scholz Design, Inc.
Defendant:
Samuel Barber, Jr. and Spencer Residential, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
CREWS et al v. CITY OF PORT ST JOE FLORIDA et al
as 5:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
RACHEL CREWS, GWENDOLYN BANKS, JAMIE GAIL BOLDEN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PORT ST JOE FLORIDA, CITY OF PORT ST JOE FLORIDA, CITY OF PORT ST JOE FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
