Cases 11 - 20 of 79
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47788
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36482
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv31343
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2021cv01623
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott Smith
Defendant:
Bob Gualtieri, Spiva, Mextzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv27545
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chappell v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Dekalb County, Alabama, Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy T Buckner and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Coit Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05411
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edmonds v. Skinner et al
as 6:2020cv01665
Respondent:
Nicholas Abroe, Clifton Graves, Jonathan Andrew Skinner and others
Petitioner:
Marquaze Leroy Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77559
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv75491
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN SCOTT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
