Cases 11 - 20 of 2,680
Kimbrough v. State of Alabama (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00510
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Plaintiff:
William Toby Kimbrough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Franklin, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Octavius Darrell Hampton
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collins v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00468
Defendant:
Captain, Sgt. Moore, Lt. Gartland and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Leroy Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barksdale v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2024cv01022
Respondent:
Jimmy Kilgore and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
Christopher Blake Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wooten v. Shaffer et al
as 4:2024cv00988
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of ALabama and Scotty Shaffer
Petitioner:
David P Wooten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQueen v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2024cv00987
Defendant:
Convicted Inmates, Staff Employees, State of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00425
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Crow et al
as 2:2024cv00943
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and John Crow
Petitioner:
Renard L Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
