Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Jones v. Clayton Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2015cv02609
Plaintiff:
David Joseph Jones
Defendant:
Clayton Judicial Circuit, Tracy Graham Lawson, Teresa M. Stolze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wilkerson v. US Secret Service and agents et al
as 1:2013cv00107
Plaintiff:
Charlene D. Wilkerson
Defendant:
US Secret Service and agents, Gina Cook, Jimmy Albright and others
Enriquez v. Six Unknown Agents et al
as 1:2012cv03092
Plaintiff:
James Enriquez
Defendant:
Six Unknown Agents and President of the United States Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Agents et al
as 1:2012cv03094
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Agents and President of the United States Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson v. Federal Government and Unknown Agent(s) et al
as 1:2012cv00498
Plaintiff:
Charlene D. Wilkerson
Defendant:
Federal Government and Unknown Agent(s), Angela Williams, Sanford Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520
Williams v. Karf et al
as 4:2010cv00221
Plaintiff:
Domenic M. Williams
Defendant:
Michael Karf, Otis Johnson, unknown agent, Georgia Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera v. Six Unknown Agents et al
as 1:2010cv01421
Plaintiff:
Sergio Herrera
Defendant:
Six Unknown Agents and Mr. President Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. Shellnut et al
as 4:2009cv00074
Petitioner:
Richard Jerome Hammonds
Respondent:
Mark Shellnut, John G. Cogner, Robert B. Bickerstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammonds v. Shellnut et al
as 1:2009cv01617
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Hammonds
Defendant:
Mark Shellnut, John G. Cogner, Robert B. Bickerstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
