Cases 11 - 20 of 335
Patel v. The United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2024mi00011
Plaintiff:
The Excellent The Excellent Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
The United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Patel v. The United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
The Excellent Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
The United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BLAKEY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
as 5:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE BLAKEY and TERRENCE BLAKEY
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reinier Angulo v. The Shyft Group Usa, Inc., et al
as 23-13599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REINIER ANGULO
Defendant / Appellee:
THE SHYFT GROUP USA, INC.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Jackson v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04078
Plaintiff:
Jonah Jackson
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Shane Serritt and Josh Thompson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
