Cases 21 - 30 of 7,511
Yuko Paradoa v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2024cv81072
Plaintiff:
Martha Isabel Yuko Paradoa
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dodson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00920
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Girard Dodson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
DOEDLI v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Nicole L Doedli
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Canty v. Pham
as 1:2024cv03963
Petitioner:
Martin Canty
Respondent:
Angela Pham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00563
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Christina R Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Martin v. Sam's East, Inc
as 2:2024cv14286
Plaintiff:
KAREN TAMARA MARTIN
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Soden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
Melissa Soden
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin-Suggs et al v. Height
as 1:2024cv03919
Plaintiff:
Hildiah Martin-Suggs, Hildiah Martin Suggs Ltd., Peace and Blessings Ministries Inc and others
Defendant:
Tywana Marie Height
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6851 Civil Action Relating to Disclosure of Intimate Images
Lucas et al v. Quick Moving Company LLC et al
as 1:2024cv23322
Defendant:
Martin Richard Aquilar and Quick Moving Company LLC
Plaintiff:
Irina Jimenez and Orlando Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Lucas et al v. Quick Moving Company LLC et al
as 1:2024cv23328
Plaintiff:
Orlando Lucas and Irina Jimenez
Defendant:
Martin Richard Aguilar and Quick Moving Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
