Cases 21 - 30 of 109
PRITCHARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61925
Plaintiff:
GRANT PRITCHARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRITCHARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61926
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PRITCHARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2021cv04246
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Green
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Cadeem Pritchard and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRITCHARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55093
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN PRITCHARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Travis Pritchard
as 21-13161
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TRAVIS RYAN PRITCHARD
Hanks et al v. Pritchard Global Security, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03677
Plaintiff:
Darrien Hanks and Abdoulie Jeng
Defendant:
Pritchard Global Security, LLC and Lorenzo Pritchard
Pritchard v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv01013
Petitioner:
James Pritchard
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PRITCHARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15626
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JASON PRITCHARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRITCHARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv04397
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PRITCHARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRITCHARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv07712
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA PRITCHARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
