Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv22279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv61078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Norris v. Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2020cv20179
Plaintiff:
Mr. Bernard B. Norris
Defendant:
Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Alishan Abdulaziz, et al v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 19-14356
Respondent / Appellee:
INTERIM ICE/ERO FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR FOR THE ATLANTA DISTRICT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, DIRECTOR FOR ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALISHAN ABDULAZIZ and PADMINI RAMPERSAUD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv14388
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv23913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Eugene Smith v. Acting Secretary, USDHS
as 19-13224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUGENE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ACTING SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Nessim Schloser v. Director, Miami Field Office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2019cv23346
Defendant:
Kenneth Cuccinelli, Yeseira Diaz, Kevin McAleenan and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Nessim Schloser
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Schloser v. Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Miami Field Office et al
as 1:2019cv23310
Defendant:
Director Yeseira Diaz, Kevin McAleenan, Kenneth Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Michel Nessim Schloser
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01954
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
