Cases 21 - 30 of 110
NOVA v. JONES et al
as 1:2019cv21668
Defendant:
JANE DOE, TWO UNKNOWN STATE CLASSIFICATION OFFICERS, C. Greene and others
Plaintiff:
TONY E NOVA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Scott et al
as 3:2019cv00318
Defendant:
B. Roberts, J. S. Edwards, Robert Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Shaw Vale Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHEELER v. JONES et al
as 4:2019cv00092
Plaintiff:
GLENN WHEELER
Defendant:
DOE, C GREENE, K MARCHANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENE v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00161
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff:
Michael C Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NELSON v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHIEF OF CLASSIFICATION, DAWN CASE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. United States of America
as 8:2018cv02860
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Ramon C. Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Coleman v. Crews et al
as 3:2018cv01033
Defendant:
Douglas, Brandon S. Lowery, D. Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Shaw Vale Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARCELONA v. JONES
as 5:2018cv00180
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, E D WATSON, C GREENE and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL BARCELONA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Sanders v. John Greene, et al
as 18-13046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN C. GREENE, In his Individual and Official Capacity, CHARLES P. RICHTER, In his Individual and Official Capacity, JOHN A. COATES, In his Individual and Official Capacity and others
United State of America v. Green
as 2:2018mc01089
Petitioner:
United State of America
Respondent:
Dewey C Green
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
