Cases 21 - 30 of 246
RJ's International Trading, LLC v. Crown Castle South, LLC
as 23-10453
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RJ'S INTERNATIONAL TRADING, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CROWN CASTLE SOUTH, LLC
Castle v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Patricia Castle
Defendant:
Jeld-Wen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Castle Key Indemnity Company v. Whitman et al
as 6:2022cv02294
Plaintiff:
Castle Key Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Todd Whitman, Scott Allen and Todd H. Whitman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
James Douse v. Sabrina Traeger, et al
as 22-13949
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES NATHANIEL DOUSE
Defendant / Appellee:
SABRINA TRAEGER, CANOE CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, INC. and CASTLE MANAGEMENT, LLC
Castle v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv23624
Plaintiff:
Dale Castle
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
USA v. Lori Carver
as 22-13608
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
LORI L. CARVER
Defendant / Appellee:
CASTLE MEDICAL, LLC
CASTLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv21388
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN CASTLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CASTLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN CASTLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
A.M. Castle & Co. v. Premiere Manufacturing Company LLC
as 6:2022cv01847
Plaintiff:
A.M. CASTLE & CO.
Defendant:
PREMIERE MANUFACTURING COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Crown Castle Fiber, LLC v. Viking Utility, Inc.
as 0:2022cv61556
Plaintiff:
Crown Castle Fiber, LLC
Defendant:
Viking Utility, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
