Cases 21 - 30 of 130
Cato v. Akies et al
as 1:2022cv04157
Plaintiff:
Xavier Cato
Defendant:
Randy Akies and Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CATO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17468
Plaintiff:
JOEY CATO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
CATO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08408
Plaintiff:
DAVID CATO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CATO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04544
Plaintiff:
MONICA CATO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Knighton et al v. Safe Haven Recovery, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv24030
Plaintiff:
James Knighton, Roshad Smiley, Michael Nesbitt and others
Defendant:
Safe Haven Recovery, Inc. and Luis De La Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CATOE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57805
Plaintiff:
KC CATOE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv61957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Elise LaMartina v. City of Mandeville, Louisiana, et al
as 21-12861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELISE LAMARTINA
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MANDEVILLE, LOUISIANA, CLAY MADDEN, GERALD STICKER and others
Speech First, Inc. v. Alexander Cartwright
as 21-12583
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEXANDER CARTWRIGHT, DANA JUNTENEN, MATTHEW HALL and others
Not Classified By Court:
CATO INSTITUTE, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
