Cases 21 - 30 of 160
BELL v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD BELL, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell v. Osceola County Corrections
as 6:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Osceola County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Hillsborough County Sheriff Department et al
as 8:2022cv02827
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Burrell, Jr.
Defendant:
Hillsborough County Sheriff Department and Falkenburg Road Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATKINS v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20900
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD WATKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GILLIAM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23646
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD GILLIAM, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SPELLS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17193
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD SPELLS JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LERNER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12807
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD LERNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF HIGH SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF HIGH SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08014
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD JACKSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Totherow v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00581
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Totherow
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
