Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Robinson v. DeSantis et al
as 8:2022cv02494
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Robinson
Defendant:
Ronald DeSantis, Chad Chronister, Mary O'Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Starkey v. Commander et al
as 8:2022cv02476
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Starkey
Defendant:
Facility Commander, Lt. Shift Commander, Sgt. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smola v. Chronister et al
as 8:2022cv02383
Plaintiff:
Joshua Smola
Defendant:
Chad Chronister and Jack Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Starkey v. Chronister et al
as 8:2022cv02263
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Starkey
Defendant:
Chad Chronister, Chambers, Cpl. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Theriault v. Kennedy et al
as 8:2022cv02028
Plaintiff:
Jane Theriault
Defendant:
David Kennedy and Chad Chronister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Anderson v. Dawsy et al
as 8:2022cv02027
Plaintiff:
Glory Anderson
Defendant:
Brian Dawsy and Chad Chronister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hooli v. Chronister et al
as 8:2022cv01835
Defendant:
Checkmate LLC, Chad Chronister, Andre Wiggins and others
Plaintiff:
Basavaraj A. Hooli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Larry v. Chronister
as 8:2022cv01553
Plaintiff:
Damon Timothy Rashaad Larry
Defendant:
Chad Chronister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Dobosiewicz et al
as 8:2022cv01504
Plaintiff:
Frederic Roberts
Defendant:
Anthony Dobosiewicz, Eric Kjekstad, Gene Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. Chronister
as 8:2022cv01496
Plaintiff:
Jessica Long
Defendant:
Chad Chronister, Naphcare, Inc. and Keith Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
