Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 179
Moccia v. Judd et al
as 8:2019cv02249
Defendant: Grady Judd and Corizon Medical
Plaintiff: Vincent R. Moccia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Retherford v. Judd et al
as 8:2019cv01772
Plaintiff: Samuel Retherford
Defendant: Corizon Medical and Grady Judd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DERKS v. CORIZON MEDICAL, et al
as 5:2015cv00051
Plaintiff: DERKS and LARKIN DERKS
Defendant: CORIZON MEDICAL, C DAVIS, RAQUEL SKIDMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Dr. Scott et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00291
Defendant: Dr. Goltogan, Wexford Medical Services, Corizon Medical Services and others
Plaintiff: Kirby Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Leon County Sheriff et al
as 3:2019cv00596
Plaintiff: James D. Smith
Defendant: Memorial Hospital, Jail - Leon County - Nashville - Tennessee, Corizon Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLIET v JONES et al
as 4:2018cv00596
Defendant: JULIE L JONES and CORIZON MEDICAL CORP
Plaintiff: KRISTOPHER C BALLIET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Poynter et al
as 8:2018cv02592
Defendant: Corizon Medical Corporation, T. L. Poynter and Dr. Cabrelario
Plaintiff: Youncher Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AHRENS v. CORIZON MEDICAL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00434
Defendant: EXPEDITION FUGATIVE TEAM and CORIZON MEDICAL
Plaintiff: WILLIAM AHRENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROSS v. CORIZON MEDICAL
as 5:2018cv00216
Plaintiff: ROBERT G GROSS
Defendant: CORIZON MEDICAL, A VERONA, J PINERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickens v. Conway et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv03157
Defendant: R. L. (Butch) Conway, Correct Care Solutions, Dr. Shahzad Hashmi and others
Plaintiff: Geoffrey Craig Pickens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?