Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 32
James v. Taylor
as 1:2015cv02234
Plaintiff: Juan E. James
Defendant: Cedric Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Quality Distribution, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv00273
Plaintiff: Rowland E. James
Defendant: Quality Distribution, Inc. and Quality Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00369
Petitioner: Alvin E. James
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00353
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation
James v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00118
Plaintiff: Christopher E. James
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rednikov v. South Beach AIDS Project, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv24463
Plaintiff: Vladimir Rednikov
Defendant: South Beach AIDS Project, Inc. , Charles Martin , Robert M. Bobo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
James v. Teasley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00345
Petitioner: Charlie E. James
Respondent: Frankie Teasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. Teasley
as 1:2010cv02933
Petitioner: Charlie E. James
Respondent: Frankie Teasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP II
as 5:2010cv00008
Petitioner: Joe E. James
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP II
as 6:2009cv02173
Petitioner: Joe E. James
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?