Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Haralson v. United States of America Federal Aviation Administration
as 1:2019cv00264
Plaintiff:
Glenn Haralson
Defendant:
United States of America Federal Aviation Administration
Intervenor Defendant:
Kone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Southern Environmental Law Center v. Federal Aviation Administration
as 1:2018cv04763
Plaintiff:
Southern Environmental Law Center
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Garapati v. Federal Aviation Administration
as 6:2018cv00105
Plaintiff:
Prasad S. Garapati
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCaleb et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv03227
Plaintiff:
Cynthia McCaleb, M.D. and S. Blaine McCaleb, III
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Alexander v. Federal Aviation Administration
as 1:2017cv02387
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alexander
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton County, Georgia, et al v. Federal Aviation Administratio
as 17-10210
Petitioner:
CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, CLAYTON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, FOREST PARK, GEORGIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Patrick Freiwald v. Federal Aviation Administratio
as 16-13067
Petitioner:
PATRICK THEO FREIWALD
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Key West Seaplane Adventures, v. Federal Aviation Administratio
as 16-11884
Petitioner:
KEY WEST SEAPLANE ADVENTURES, LLC
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Zeifman v. Federal Aviation Administration
as 6:2016cv00322
Plaintiff:
Gabriel L. Zeifman
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
