Cases 21 - 30 of 83
RAGER v. AUGUSTINE
as 5:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
DONALD W RAGER
Defendant:
PAIGE AUGUSTINE, KEITH BUFORD, S MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramon Lopez v. USA, et al
as 14-14419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMON LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. ATTORNEY, Executive Office and others
Kelly Wadford, Jr. v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 14-14207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELLY EDWARD WADFORD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL WATTS, Administrator, National Inmate Appeals, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, SE Region, WILLIAM BECHTOLD, Coleman-Low and others
Rice v. United States et al
as 1:2014cv01766
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel D Rice
Defendant:
United States, John Rathman, A Dizon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wakefield v. Buggs et al
as 5:2014cv00457
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Wakefield
Defendant:
Sarah Buggs, USA, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Cooke et al
as 5:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
Harvey R. Johnson
Defendant:
Jason Cooke, Kenny Atkinson, Bryan Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michel v. Nowicki et al
as 5:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
Adelson Michel
Defendant:
Thomas Nowicki, FNU Adams, J. L. Dole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McLaughlin v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014cv00198
Plaintiff:
Demetrius McLaughlin
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prison, FCC Coleman - USP I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyer v. Ulmen, et al
as 8:2014cv00469
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keith Boyer
Defendant:
Richard Ulmen, John Doe #1, John Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shanklin v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00092
Plaintiff:
Frank Shanklin
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, Director of Bureau of Prisons - John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
