Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Todd Norwood v. Smith, et al
as 16-16271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD NORWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
SMITH, Officer, KITCHEN, Officer, JOHN DOE, Officer and others
Roy Daniels v. John Does
as 15-15467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY O. DANIELS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOES, Officers
Guzman v. City of Hialeah et al
as 1:2015cv23985
Plaintiff:
Laura Guzman
Defendant:
City of Hialeah, Chief of Police, City of Hialeah, Rick Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Officer
as 3:2015cv01151
Petitioner:
Norris Nelson
Respondent:
John Doe Officer, R.M.C. Main Unit, Wasdin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Officer
as 1:2015cv23113
Plaintiff:
Norris Nelson
Defendant:
John Doe Officer, R.M.C. Main Unit, Wasdin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Leon Bright v. Officer Graham, et al
as 15-13037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON BRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER GRAHAM, Tampa Police Department, JOHN DOE, Officer -Tampa Police Department and CITY OF TAMPA, FL
Terrance Curry v. Michael Day, et al
as 15-12611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRANCE DEION CURRY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL DAY and JOHN DOES, Officers of the Columbia County Drug Task Force, In their Individual and Official Capacity
Blossom, et al v. City of St. Petersburg, Florida et al
as 8:2014cv03099
Plaintiff:
Andre Blossom and Ronnie Wynn
Defendant:
City of St. Petersburg, Florida, Charles Harmon and John Doe Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leon Bright v. Graham, et al
as 14-15119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON BRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
GRAHAM, OFFICER, Tampa Police Department, JOHN DOE, Officer - Tampa Police Department, CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA and others
Jenkins v. Tucker et al
as 3:2014cv01318
Plaintiff:
George Michael Jenkins
Defendant:
Kenneth S. Tucker, Mr. Reddish, Dr. J. Aviles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
