Cases 21 - 30 of 66
KAUFMAN v. JACKSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 5:2019cv00463
Defendant:
KEITH BAILEY, JEETER, ROSENBERG and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE JAMES KAUFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSS v. JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD et al
as 5:2019cv00244
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, LARRY MOORE, TONY PUMPHREY and others
Plaintiff:
ELTON R RUSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
TUCKER v. JONES
as 3:2019cv01713
Defendant:
SANDLING SPEEDING, L PRESCOTT, GILEND SAENCES INC and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE WILLIAM TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON COUNTY v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 4:2019cv00149
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
JACKSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADKINS v. ROBERTS et al
as 5:2018cv00271
Plaintiff:
April Marie Adkins and APRIL MARIE MIDDLETON
Defendant:
Zachary Wester, LOUIS S ROBERTS, III, individually, LOUIS S ROBERTS, III as Sheriff, JACKSON COUNTY, FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARBIN v. JACKSON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT et al
as 5:2018cv00135
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT and JACKSON HOSPITAL PHYSICIAN CALL PLAN
Plaintiff:
STACY E HARBIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HARBIN v. JACKSON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
as 3:2018cv01391
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
Plaintiff:
STACY E HARBIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DAVIES v. JACKSON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 5:2018cv00041
Plaintiff:
JAMES A DAVIES
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, M FOREMAN, S HOSSEINI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
