Cases 21 - 30 of 433
James Parsons, III v. Sheriff of Jefferson County, Alabama, et al
as 22-13521
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES W. PARSONS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK PETTWAY, ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC and SHERIFF OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA
Robert Austin v. James McCann, et al
as 22-13157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ALLEN AUSTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES W. MCCANN and ELIZABETH ROSE MCHUGH
PRESLEY v. GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
GEORGE PRESLEY
Defendant:
GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, LLOYD J SPICKARD, STEPHANIE DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OSBURN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11000
Plaintiff:
James William Osburn and JAMES W OSBURN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watkins v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv03171
Plaintiff:
Charles Watkins
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, James W. Oxendine, Brenda Joy Bernstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09857
Plaintiff:
JAMES W WATSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James W. Tindall v. U.S. Department of Labor Adminstrative Review Boar
as 22-11770
Petitioner:
JAMES W. TINDALL
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ADMINSTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Richardson v. Lall et al
as 1:2022cv01831
Plaintiff:
Raymond Remell Richardson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge J. Jessy Lall, Sergeant Francious, M.P. Officer Strout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Oxendine et al
as 1:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
Charles Watkins
Defendant:
James W. Oxendine, B.J. Bernstein, Richard Coleman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
