Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Daker v. Keaton et al
as 1:2016cv03745
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Rebecca Keaton, Jay E. Stephenson, Lisa Blalock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lark v. Comenity Capital Bank
as 8:2016cv02236
Plaintiff:
Betty Lark
Defendant:
Comenity Capital Bank
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
In re: Andre Lark
as 16-14152
Petitioner:
In re: ANDRE P. LARK
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Strobel v. Youmans et al
as 3:2015cv01509
Plaintiff:
Donna Strobel
Defendant:
Roger Wayne Youmans and Lark Builders Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Lark Suddith
as 15-11965
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LARK SUDDITH
Macrotransport Services, LLC v. Meadow Lark Transport, Inc.
as 9:2013cv81041
Plaintiff:
Macrotransport Services, LLC
Defendant:
Meadow Lark Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11707
Lark v. Harbinson et al
as 1:2013cv02472
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lark
Defendant:
Charles Harbinson , One World Logistics of America, Inc. , Penske Truck Leasing Co. and others
H. Jones v. Angela Brown, et al
as 13-12888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
H. GUY JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA ZELMA MOORE BROWN, Attorney, and Pro Hac Vice Judge, State Court of Cobb County, Georgia, S. LARK INGRAM, Judge, Superior Court of Cobb Cnty, GA., AN INNOMINATE INDIVIDUAL KNOWN AS:, Dony Lynn Green-Well, Donyale Lynn Duncan, Donyale Lynn Greenwell, Donyale Lynn Duncan-Greenwell, Donyale Lynn Greenwell-Duncan and others
DeWayne et al v. State of Georgia, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01487
Plaintiff:
Consuela Graciella DeWayne and Ruben DeWayne
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Inc., Cobb County, Inc., Frank Cox and others
Jones v. Brown et al
as 1:2013cv00528
Plaintiff:
H. Guy Jones
Defendant:
Angela Zelma Moore Brown, An Innominate Individual Known As, Sylvia Lark Ingram and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
