Cases 21 - 30 of 6,515
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
MILLER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Alegro Trading, LLC
as 1:2024cv21932
Plaintiff:
William Miller
Defendant:
Alegro Trading, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Miller v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Lisa Miller
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Marshall, George P Keary, Mark Kellianen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Michael Gorbey v. Brian Davis, et al
as 24-11527
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
BRIAN J. DAVIS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISIONS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Michael Miller v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11514
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Avion Lawson v. John Holtz, et al
as 24-11153
Plaintiff:
AVION LAWSON
Defendant:
JOHN HOLTZ, V. MALDONADO, RUEDA and others
Gildersleeve et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00598
Defendant:
3M Company, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Godfrey Gildersleeve, Joseph Albert Arcaini, April Bijak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
