Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Wappler v. Law Library Supervisor et al
as 6:2018cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Wappler
Defendant:
Law Library Supervisor, Mail-Room Supervisor, Brevard County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Mailroom Dept. Supv. et al
as 3:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Cooper
Defendant:
Mailroom Dept. Supv. and RMC - Mail Room Staff Main Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Jones et al
as 8:2017cv02768
Plaintiff:
Nicklous Travis Anderson
Defendant:
Julia L. Jones and Hardee C.I. Mail Room Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Jones et al
as 6:2017cv01924
Plaintiff:
Nicklous Travis Anderson
Defendant:
Julia L. Jones and Hardee C.I. Mail Room Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brevard County Jail Complex Mail Room et al
as 6:2017cv01692
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Brevard County Jail Complex Mail Room and Deputies Administration E.T.A.L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walde v. Marion County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2016cv00632
Plaintiff:
Paul Walde
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff's Office, Emery Gainey and Marion County Sheriff's Office Mail Room
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Burch v. Warden, et al
as 16-12850
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT BURCH
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, V. RICHARDSON, Classification, JOHN HUTTON, Corrections Captain and others
Frankie Raines v. Warden, et al
as 16-11619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKIE RAINES
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, BEVIS, Mail Room, SWANSON, F Dorm Sgt. and others
Carey v. Knight et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Ms. Knight and Mail Room Clerks at Kilby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Jones, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00799
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones , Sandra Giles , Rene Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
