Cases 21 - 30 of 273
HUDOCK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03285
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PAULK HUDOCK, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOYD v. PAULK et al
as 7:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
GARETH COY BOYD
Defendant:
Sheriff ASHLEY PAULK and Captain JASON CLIFTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
PAULK v. SESSLER et al
as 3:2022cv24982
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY J PAULK
Defendant:
SESSLER, SESSLER'S CO WORKER and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paulk v. Wellpath Health Services et al
as 9:2022cv81903
Plaintiff:
Reginald Andrew Paulk, Sr.
Defendant:
Wellpath Health Services, A. Ward and Rick Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUDLEY v. PAULK et al
as 7:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JAMARIE DUDLEY
Defendant:
ASHLEY PAULK, CAPTAIN JASON CLIFTON, MR MATTHEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. PAULK et al
as 7:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
GARETH COY BOYD
Defendant:
Sheriff ASHLEY PAULK, JASON CLIFTON and ROBERT PICCIOTTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUTCHLEY v. CLIFTON et al
as 7:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Defendant:
CAPTAIN CLIFTON and SHERIFF ASHLEY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. PAULK et al
as 7:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH ROBINSON
Defendant:
SHERIFF ASHLEY PAULK, CAPTAIN JASON LEE CLIFTON and SERGEANT RICHARD SWANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRUTCHLEY v. ADDISON et al
as 7:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Defendant:
CAPTAIN ADDISON, SERGEANT CLARK and SHERIFF RAY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
