Cases 21 - 30 of 30
McGilvery v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2012cv01933
Plaintiff:
Ronald James McGilvery, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
James et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01203
Plaintiff:
Ronald James and Latasha James
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
James v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 1:2011cv03213
Plaintiff:
Ronald James
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Puryear v. North Courtland Police Dept. et al
as 2:2011cv02600
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Puryear
Defendant:
North Courtland Police Dept., Ronald James, North Courtland Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillard v. Kimberly et al
as 2:2010cv14240
Plaintiff:
Ronald James Dillard
Defendant:
Altier M. Kimberly, Michael Grieco Jr., Michael Abell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald James v. USA
as 10-11591
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD JAMES, as guardian ad litem Ronald N. James
Respondent - Appellee:
USA
Arnicar et al v. Bayer Corp et al
as 9:2009cv80381
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Arnicar, Phillip E. Boyd, Marvin J. Boyd, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Healthcare AG
Cause Of Action: Diversity
James v. USA
as 1:2008cv02371
Petitioner:
Ronald James
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
James v. Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility
as 1:2008cv01422
Plaintiff:
Ronald James
Defendant:
Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amison v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv08008
Plaintiff:
Ronald James Amison
Defendant:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
