Cases 21 - 30 of 205
Cantrell v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Yusef Cantrell
Defendant:
Judge Kimberly Adams, D.A. Paul Howard, Jr. and Assistant D.A. Clinton Rucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Scowden et al
as 2:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Scowden, C. Redford, K. Tisdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUCKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11573
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DARRELL RUCKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUCKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv10972
Plaintiff:
STANLEY LAMAR RUCKER and STANLEY L RUCKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUCKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv10990
Plaintiff:
STANLEY LAMAR RUCKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUCKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08221
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RUCKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rolfe v. Bottoms et al
as 1:2022cv02339
Plaintiff:
Garrett Rolfe
Defendant:
Keisha Lance Bottoms, Paul Howard, Erika Shields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brosnan v. Bottoms et al
as 1:2022cv02337
Plaintiff:
Devin Brosnan
Defendant:
Keisha Lance Bottoms, Paul Howard, Donald Hannah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Drinks et al
as 1:2022cv00827
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Edward Drinks, Cidnei M. Rucker and Felicia Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Rucker v. American Security Insurance Company
as 0:2021cv62504
Plaintiff:
Vickie Rucker
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
