Cases 21 - 30 of 195
v. Rosenberg et al
as 1:2022cv23641
Defendant:
Joseph Rosenberg, NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD., a BERMUDA CORPORATION, d/b/a NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE, ONE SPA WORLD LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Edward Steiner v. Goerner, et al
as 22-13421
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD ROBERT STEINER
Respondent / Appellee:
GOERNER, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA and others
Steiner v. Goerner et al
as 6:2022cv01647
Petitioner:
Edward R. Steiner
Respondent:
Judge Goerner, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Seminole County, Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andre Johnson v. Matt Steiner
as 22-11757
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE T. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MATT STEINER
Edward Steiner v. Hamilton CI Annex Warden
as 22-11548
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD ROBERT STEINER
Respondent / Appellee:
HAMILTON CI ANNEX WARDEN
Edward Steiner v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-11228
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD ROBERT STEINER
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Steiner v. Warden, Hamilton Correctional Institution Annex
as 6:2022cv00601
Petitioner:
Edward Robert Steiner
Respondent:
Warden, Hamilton Correctional Institution Annex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lyons v. France et al
as 3:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
James Lyons
Defendant:
Christopher A. France, Laura M. Steiner and Ellen Whitton Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merritt v. Snyder et al
as 2:2021cv00306
Defendant:
M. Thweat, FNU Alverez, FNU Torres and others
Plaintiff:
Larry B. Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Powell v. Snyder et al
as 2:2021cv00298
Defendant:
M Thweatt, Canistatic, O. Estrada and others
Plaintiff:
La'Marquis Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
