Cases 21 - 30 of 1,350
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crouch v. Jessup
as 2:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Edward Jasper Crouch
Respondent:
Stephen Jessup
Other:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PORTER v. CALDWELL et al
as 5:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
MARLEY PORTER
Defendant:
JASON E. CALDWELL, STEPHENS PIPE & STEEL, LLC, HUGO TRUCKING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Wilson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wilson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Carvalho et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Stephen Carvalho and Saria Carvalho
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Eckerd v. Jump et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Rebecca J. Walden, Roger B. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Shonterria Stephens
Defendant:
Joseph Edward Smith and Annett Holdings, Inc. doing business as TMC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Gardner et al v. Jessup
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Timothy Gardner, Teck Electric, LLC and John Doe
Defendant:
Stephen Jessup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ISOM v. STEPHENS PIPE & STEEL, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ISOM
Defendant:
STEPHENS PIPE & STEEL LLC, HUGO TRUCKING INC, JASON CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
