Cases 21 - 30 of 31
United States of America ex rel. et al Nix v. United Biologics, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01486
Defendant:
United Biologics, LLC doing business as United Allergy Services formerly known as United Allergy Labs, United Allergy Labs, Decatur Pediatric Group, P.A. and others
Petitioner:
Bothwell Law Group, P.C., Mike Bothwell and Bothwell Bracker P.C.
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel., State of California ex rel., State of Colorado ex rel. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America et al v. Healogics, Inc.
as 6:2014cv00283
Defendant:
UF Health, Orlando Health, IU Health Goshen Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America et al v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2013mc22949
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California , State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation and Kmart Corporation
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Cless et al v. Melitta Benz GMBH & Co. KG et al
as 8:2011cv00069
Plaintiff:
Richard K. Cless, Jr. , Dawn Cless , USA and others
Defendant:
Melitta Benz GMBH & Co. KG, Melitta North America, Inc., Melitta USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America ex rel. v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 1:2012cv02431
Plaintiff:
United States of America Ex Rel, State of California, ex rel., State of Colorado, ex rel. and others
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation, 112 Burleigh Avenue Norfolk, LLC, 1515 West State Street Boise, Idaho, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al
as 11-11067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THE NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD, STATE LEGISLATORS and others
Not Classified By Court:
JAMES F. BLUMSTEIN, THE INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Plaintiff:
HR POLICY ASSOCIATION
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al
as 11-11067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Dellamerica v. FBI et al
as 1:2009cv23778
Plaintiff:
Michael Dellamerica
Defendant:
FBI, Police from the state of California and Police from the state of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kramer v. Walgreen Co.
as 8:2008cv01917
Plaintiff:
Ken Kramer
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., CVS Caremark Corporation, Publix Super Markets, Inc. and others
Movant:
United States of America , State of California, State of Delaware and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America et al v. Eisai, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv22302
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Michael Keeler , State of California and others
Defendant:
Eisai, Inc., 100 Tice Blvd., Woodcliff Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
