Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Clarke v. Bo et al
as 4:2016cv10067
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Clarke
Defendant:
Sonya Bo and Karen Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2014cv00634
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Defendant:
Calhoun, Scott, Evelgor Dorsett and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Scott et al
as 2:2014cv00598
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Scott, C Simpson, Jason Smith and others
ABNEY et al v. PLANT PERFORMANCE SERVICES LLC
as 3:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ABNEY, MICHAEL S ADAMS, JOHN C ALDERMAN and others
Defendant:
PLANT PERFORMANCE SERVICES LLC doing business as P2S, FLUOR ENTERPRISES INC, BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haynes v. Clark et al
as 3:2013cv00984
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
L. T. Clark, U.C.I. Security and U.C.I. Mental Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staver v. Clark et al
as 4:2012cv00242
Plaintiff:
Seth Staver
Defendant:
Samuel T. Clark and Clark Ambulance Service, Inc.
Clark v. Alabama Trust Bank, National Association, et al
as 1:2012cv02620
Plaintiff:
James T Clark
Defendant:
Guardian Bancshares Inc , Oliver Harmon Allen , Robert Kenneth Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEF Assignment Corporation v. Northside Village Partnership GP, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv04074
Plaintiff:
NEF Assignment Corporation
Defendant:
Northside Village Partnership GP, LLC , Satish S. Lathi, Jay T. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Opelika Chief of Police, et al (INMATE2)
as 3:2011cv00943
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Roberts
Defendant:
Lee County, Lee County Sheriff Dept, Jay Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pousson et al v. Directv, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00523
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Pousson and Timothy T. Clark
Defendant:
Directv, Inc. and Directv Home Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
