Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Allen v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv04905
Defendant:
Counselor Cripp, Renfroe, Dr. Decruise and others
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYWARD v. TOBY et al
as 5:2018cv00357
Defendant:
ANNETTE TOBY, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CANNON, REGIONAL DIRECTOR ROBERT TOOLE and others
Plaintiff:
BENNY HAYWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JARRELL v. THOMPSON et al
as 4:2018cv00186
Defendant:
THOMPSON, HAZEL VAUGHN and THORTON
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KEITH JARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEYER et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02070
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE PORTER, DIONNE REISERT, SHARON L. REITER and others
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2018cv00182
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Dr. Sharma, Deputy Warden of Sec Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Devner Fenton Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorton v. Sneed et al
as 9:2018cv80984
Defendant:
Terry Sneed and Ric L. Bradshaw
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Thorton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOOKADOO v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A LOOKADOO
Defendant:
BELINDA DAVIS, ERIC SELLERS, MICHAEL CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCHANNON v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2018cv00192
Plaintiff:
CHAD BUCHANNON
Defendant:
ERIC SELLERS, MICHAEL CANNON, WILLIAM POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Jal Chemical Co., Inc.
as 1:2018cv02429
Plaintiff:
Josh Williams , Quayterez Brawley , Zachary Coleman and others
Defendant:
Jal Chemical Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
HICKS v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2018cv00185
Plaintiff:
DANTHONY HICKS
Defendant:
ERIC SELLERS, WILLIAM POWELL, MICHAEL CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
