Cases 21 - 30 of 18,823
Anesha Parker v. Roseberte Clervil, et al
as 24-11293
Plaintiff:
ANESHA PARKER
Defendant:
ROSEBERTE CLERVIL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Vincent Poole v. State of Florida, et al
as 24-11238
Plaintiff:
VINCENT POOLE
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, FDC MIAMI ASSISTANT WARDEN, JANE DOE and others
State of Kansas et al v. The United States Department of Labor et al
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
State of Kansas, State of Georgia, State of South Carolina and others
Defendant:
The United States Department of Labor, Jose' Javier Rodri'guez and Jessica Looman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Artavious CottonIn re: Artavious Cotton
as 24-11897
Petitioner:
In re: ARTAVIOUS V. COTTON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Luis Rodriguez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11861
Petitioner:
LUIS ADAN RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Michael Fillmore v. State of Florida Prosecutor's Office for Broward C, et al
as 24-11913
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. FILLMORE
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE FOR BROWARD COUNTY, MICHAEL J. SATZ, CHRISTINA STRANDELL and others
GASTON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
CARLOS JOSE GASTON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. The State of Florida
as 3:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Deandre L. Williams
Defendant:
The State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kyle Melady v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11186
Petitioner:
KYLE MELADY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jamiel Jerrido v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11295
Petitioner:
JAMIEL JERRIDO
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
