Cases 21 - 30 of 1,659
Walker v. Unites States Penitentiary Coleman #2 et al
as 5:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Randall Lee Walker
Defendant:
Unites States Penitentiary Coleman #2, FNU Swain, FNU Summerfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Joseph Bozicevich v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 23-14016
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH C. BOZICEVICH
Respondent / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Jeremy Achey v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 23-13964
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEREMY P. ACHEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Bolton v. USP Coleman II
as 5:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bolton
Defendant:
USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Oriyomi Sadiq Aloba v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 23-13736
Petitioner / Appellant:
ORIYOMI ALOBA and ORIYOMI SADDIQ ALOBA
Respondent / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Duffy v. Magilligan et al
as 8:2023cv02604
Plaintiff:
John Duffy
Defendant:
Tom Magilligan, Edward Haab, USPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall Williams v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 23-13759
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Larson v. Warden, FCC Coleman-USP II
as 5:2023cv00734
Petitioner:
Matthew Larson
Respondent:
Warden, Coleman USP and Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scotland v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00603
Petitioner:
Thomas Allen Scotland
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hutchins v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP-1
as 5:2023cv00624
Petitioner:
Robert Leslie Hutchins, Jr
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman USP-1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
