Cases 21 - 30 of 116
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Boe et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Eknes-Tucker, Brianna Boe, James Zoe and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Daryl D. Bailey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
State of Arkansas, State of West Virginia, State of Indiana and others
Petitioner:
Eagle Forum of Alabama and Southeast Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. et al v. Timeshare Exit Hotline et al
as 6:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. and Wyndham Resort Development Corporation
Defendant:
Timeshare Exit Hotline a/k/a Airtime Media, LLC, Fonbuena Law Firm, CHTD d/b/a Timeshare Defense Attorneys, Fonbuena Law Firm, PLLC, d/b/a Timeshare Defense Attorneys and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
State of Florida et al v. Walensky et al
as 8:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
ROCHELLE P WALENSKY, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, SHERRI A BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rebando et al v. CooperSurgical, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Shelby Marie Rebando, Brad James Rebando, Cassondra Caputo and others
Defendant:
CooperSurgical, Inc., The Cooper Companies, Inc., Femcare Ltd - UK subsidiary of Utah Medical Products, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Froman et al v. Coopersurgical Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Brianna Mae Froman and Christopher Froman
Defendant:
Coopersurgical Inc, The Cooper Companies Inc., Femcare LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mack et al v. CooperSurgical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jackie Dianna Mack and Frankie Mack
Defendant:
CooperSurgical, Inc., The Cooper Companies, Inc., Femcare, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blevins-Ellington v. CooperSurgical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Christa Blevins-Ellington, Kimyania Smith, Marcous Ford and others
Defendant:
CooperSurgical, Inc., The Cooper Companies, Inc., Femcare, Ltd. -UK Subsidiary of Utah Medical Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
State of Georgia, et al v. President of the United States, et al
as 21-14269
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE and AMERICAN PSYCHIATRICS INSTITUTE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
