Cases 21 - 30 of 282
Carder v. Phillips et al
as 2:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Patricia Carder
Defendant:
Sgt. Kenneth Phillips and Deputy Robert Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waters v. State of Georgia
as 6:2022cv00062
Petitioner:
Joshstavie Waters
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
RIDLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WARD, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EPA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fuss v. Bensch et al
as 1:2022cv00064
Defendant:
Frederick M. Bensch, Freddy Bensch, Cheese Grits, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ray Scott Fuss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
McPherson v. Fulton County Jail
as 1:2021cv04963
Plaintiff:
Quintin Anton McPherson and Quentin Anton McPherson
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Sgt. Kane, Sgt. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN et al v. COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN and CLARA VIRGINIA BRITTON
Defendant:
COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Officer ROBERT HOOKS, Officer KERTAVIOUS COPPINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters v. Soma Intimates, LLC
as 1:2021cv03538
Plaintiff:
Anthony Waters
Defendant:
Soma Intimates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
