Cases 21 - 30 of 33
United States of America et al v. Millennium Health, LLC
as 6:2015cv01367
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Millennium Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Wyttenbach v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2015cv00318
Plaintiff:
William H. Wyttenbach
Defendant:
State of Florida, Florida Department of Health , State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv60423
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission , State of Colorado , State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc., Linked Service Solutions, LLC, Economic Strategy LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Demos v. The State of Washington et al
as 1:2014cv24686
Plaintiff:
John R. Demos
Defendant:
The State of Washington and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
France et al v. Health Management Associates, Inc.
as 8:2013cv01264
Defendant:
Health Management Associates, Inc.
Petitioner:
USA
Interested Party:
State of Florida, State of Texas, State of Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Gretchen Miscik and Anita France
Not Classified By Court:
Peter J. Grilli
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Ahmed-Al-Khalifa v. State of Washington et al
as 5:2013cv02003
Plaintiff:
Oluwashina Kazeem Ahmed-Al-Khalifa
Defendant:
State of Washington, State of Texas, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COF, et al v. Thomas Larsen, et al
as 12-90041
Petitioner:
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, d.b.a. Capital One, NA
Respondent:
THOMAS LARSEN, resident of the State of Washington, BRENT LOWE, resident of the State of Illinois, JENNIFER PALACIOS, resident of the State of Washington and others
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Department of HHS, et al
as 11-11021
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through Pam Bondi Attorney General, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, by and through Alan Wilson Attorney General, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THE NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD, STATE LEGISLATORS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, HR POLICY ASSOCIATION, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al
as 11-11067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THE NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD, STATE LEGISLATORS and others
Not Classified By Court:
JAMES F. BLUMSTEIN, THE INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Plaintiff:
HR POLICY ASSOCIATION
STATE OF FLORIDA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through BILL MCCOLLUM , STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, by and through HENRY McMASTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through JON BRUNING, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as THE SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
