Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arrow Air, Inc. v. Local 747, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
as 1:2008cv20574
Plaintiff:
Arrow Air, Inc.
Defendant:
Local 747, International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Local 747, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Counter Claimant:
Local 747, International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Local 747, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Counter Defendant:
Arrow Air, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0151 Railway Labor Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Waste Management Inc. of Florida v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters,
as 0:2007cv61820
Plaintiff:
Waste Management Inc. of Florida, Waste Management Inc. of Florida and Waste Management Inc. of Florida
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 01851 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Hawk Opportunity Fund, L.P. v. Zimmer et al
as 1:2007cv00907
Plaintiff:
Hawk Opportunity Fund, L.P., Hawk Opportunity Fund, L.P., Hawk Opportunity Fund, L.P. and others
Defendant:
Yucaipa American Alliance Fund I, L.P., Yucaipa American Alliance (Parallel) Fund, L.P., International Brotherhood of Teamsters and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bianchi v. Int'L Brotherhood, et al
as 1:2002cv21417
Plaintiff:
Amadeo Bianchi
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, and Warehousemen, Local 390 and Roadway Express, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 01851 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
