Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Grossman et al
as 0:2018cv61234
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Isaac Grossman, Adriana Grossman, Dragon-Click Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Jeffrey L. Orr v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2018cv21310
3Rd Party Defendant:
Roes, Takata Corporation and TK Holdings Inc.
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Does 1 through 20, inclusive and Tuttle Click's Capistrano Ford, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Orr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Fendi Adele, S.r.l. v. Chengzhanqiang et al
as 0:2016cv62456
Plaintiff:
Fendi Adele, S.r.l.
Defendant:
chengzhanqiang, China YK Trade co., LTD, Clever life and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Broadhead v. Scott et al
as 2:2016cv00786
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Tarsha Scott, Amberly Click and Women
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dulaney v. Forsyth County Detention Center et al
as 2:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dulaney
Defendant:
Click
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Robinson et al
as 2:2016cv00620
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Brian Robinson, Gasdon, Clifforde Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Robinson et al
as 2:2016cv00423
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Brion Robinson, Haygood, Gasdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Haygood et al
as 2:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Haygood, M Holtzclaw, Dennis Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Robinson et al
as 2:2016cv00396
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Brian Robinson, Amberly Click, Clinton Thrasher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Scott et al
as 2:2016cv00350
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Tarsha Scott, Amberly Click, M Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
