Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Lee v. Attorney General of the United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv22831
Plaintiff:
Alfred Wayne Lee
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States of America , United States Department of Justice, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02366
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02262
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Palmat International, Inc.,et al v Attorney General of the United States of America
as 1:2012cv20229
Petitioner:
Palmat International, Inc. and Roberto Wellisch
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Galaviz v. Rathman et al
as 1:2011cv01730
Petitioner:
Juan M Galaviz
Respondent:
John T Rathman and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burke v. Rathman et al
as 1:2011cv01437
Petitioner:
Stephen G Burke
Respondent:
John T Rathman and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pinson v. Rathman et al
as 1:2011cv00329
Petitioner:
Jeremy Pinson
Respondent:
John T. Rathman and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singletary v. Ratham et al
as 2:2010cv03396
Petitioner:
Albert Bruce Singletary
Respondent:
John Ratham and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wiggins v. Rathman et al
as 1:2010cv02519
Petitioner:
Chavon Wiggins
Respondent:
John T. Rathman and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-11058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
