Cases 31 - 40 of 108
Lee v. Johnson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00370
Defendant:
Captain McCovery, Patrice Richie Jones, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gregory Lee and Gregory Kenneth Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BABER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv84030
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DELON P BABER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BABERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv09604
Plaintiff:
QUINCY T BABERS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BABER v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01021
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BABER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonds v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00056
Plaintiff:
James Willis Bonds
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, D. Whitley, D. Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BABERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv00734
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GARY G BABERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BABERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00634
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
QUINCY BABERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENRY et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03078
Plaintiff:
WESLEY BRAND, HADRIAN CLEAGUE, VICTOR VOLYNETS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00561
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Kay Ivey and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00306
Defendant:
Bullock Medical Department, Warden McClain, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
