Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Jones v. Professional Window Tinters of Miami, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv20640
Plaintiff:
Byron Jones
Defendant:
Professional Window Tinters of Miami, Inc. and Carlos De Cespedes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Roth & Company v. RC Hunt Prices, Inc et al
as 0:2014cv62588
Plaintiff:
Roth & Company
Defendant:
RC Hunt Prices, Inc and Ronald Cespedes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv22846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Martha Lazaro
as 14-11921
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARTHA L. LAZARO, formerly known as Martha L. De Cespedes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv21953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Flores et al v. Culpepper
as 4:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Flores , Eva Flores , Freddy Barragan and others
Defendant:
Thomas N. Culpepper, J. Leslie Cheek, Alberto Vega and others
Cespedes v. I.C.E.
as 5:2012cv00098
Petitioner:
Douglas Gainza Cespedes
Respondent:
I.C.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frankowiak v. GINN Development Company, LLC, et al
as 3:2012cv00896
Defendant:
GINN Development Company, LLC, et al , Fifth Third Bancorp , Ginn Title Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Frankowiak , Stephen Ehman , Luis De Cespedes and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Frankowiak v. GINN Development Company, LLC, et al
as 2:2012cv00295
Defendant:
GINN Development Company, LLC, et al , Fifth Third Bancorp , Ginn Title Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Frankowiak , Stephen Ehman , Luis De Cespedes and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
USA v. Alfredo Cespede
as 11-14108
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALFREDO CESPEDES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
