Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Reginald Washington, Jr. v. George Sheldon
as 11-15570
Petitioner - Appellant:
REGINALD D. WASHINGTON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE H. SHELDON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2011cv80203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Washington v. Sheldon
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2010cv00781
Petitioner:
Reginald D. Washington, Jr.
Respondent:
George H. Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. Budz et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2010cv00485
Plaintiff:
Reginald D. Washington, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Budz, Jacques Lamour, Howard Pinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2008cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WASHINGTON v. ASTRUE
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2008cv00072
Plaintiff:
SOPHIA D WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Washington v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2007cv22530
Petitioner:
Reginald D. Washington, Jr.
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Washington et al
as 3:2007cv00595
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jones
Defendant:
Leon D. Washington, Leon D. Washington, Salson Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.