Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 75
SMITH v. POWELL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00334
Defendant: KAREN FORBS, DEPUTY WARDEN WILLIAM POWELL, JOHANNES GOODY and others
Plaintiff: EUGENE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2018cv01218
Petitioner: Rodney Eugene Smith
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv02822
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv02062
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Eugene Smith v. USA
as 17-11666
Petitioner - Appellant: EUGENE SMITH, a.k.a. Sperm
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SMITH v. JONES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00199
Petitioner: EUGENE SMITH
Respondent: JULIE L JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. ZANDERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00080
Plaintiff: STEVEN EUGENE SMITH
Defendant: SAM ZANDERS, NANCY SCOTT MALCOR and MARTHA C CHRISTIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Steven Smith
as 15-15293
Petitioner: In re: STEVEN EUGENE SMITH
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
In re: Eugene Smith
as 15-13718
Petitioner: In re: EUGENE SMITH
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. Co-Horizon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01020
Defendant: Co-Horizon
Plaintiff: Eugene Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?