Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Curtis Tompkins v. Dorothy Rogers, et al
as 13-10996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS T. TOMPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOROTHY ROGERS, JEFFERSON COUNTY FAMILY COURT BIRMINGHAM, AL and JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
Tompkins v. Rogers et al
as 2:2013cv00384
Plaintiff:
Curtis Tompkins
Defendant:
Dorothy Rogers, Jefferson County Family Court Birmingham, AL and Jefferson County Department of Human Resources/Child Support Enforcement Birmingham, AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Thomas v. H. Allred, Judge
as 12-12298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EARL THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE, in his official capacity of the Family Court
Curtis Tompkins v. Dorothy Rogers, et al
as 12-10983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS T. TOMPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOROTHY ROGERS, FAMILY COURT and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Birmingham, Alabama
Tompkins v. Rogers et al
as 2:2012cv00491
Plaintiff:
Curtis T Tompkins
Defendant:
Dorothy Rogers, Family Court and DHR Child Support Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham Vockroth v. First Circuit Family Court, et al
as 10-15505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRAHAM VOCKROTH
Defendant - Appellee:
FIRST CIRCUIT FAMILY COURT OF HAWAII and MINA LEE VOCKROTH
Vockroth v. First Circuit Family Court of Hawaii et al
as 1:2010cv00695
Plaintiff:
Graham Vockroth
Defendant:
First Circuit Family Court of Hawaii and Mina Lee Vockroth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert v. USA et al
as 3:2007cv00315
Plaintiff:
Susan Herbert
Defendant:
USA, George Bush, Richard Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
KPL et al v. Alabama State Board of Human Resources et al
as 2:2007cv00075
Plaintiff:
KPL and Karl Randolph Lentz
Defendant:
Alabama State Board of Human Resources, Bob Riley, Alabama Department of Human Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
