Cases 31 - 40 of 1,666
Murrell v. Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation
as 8:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle Murrell
Defendant:
Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Broton
as 5:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Gabriel Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Jennifer A. Broton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas Dean v. National Labor Relations Board
as 24-10436
Petitioner:
THOMAS GABRIEL DEAN
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
USA v. Angel Palanco, et al
as 24-10257
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL GABRIEL PALANCO, HUMBERTO VASQUEZ DIAZ and OSVALDO GONZALEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Bowen v. Prock et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Nathaniel Bowen
Defendant:
Prock, Pittman, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 8:2024cv00199
Petitioner:
Gabriel Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Jennifer A. Broton and Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marina Herrada-Gamonal, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10181
Petitioner:
MARINA HERRADA-GAMONAL, GINO L. MONTES-HERRADA and GABRIEL A. MONTES-HERRADA
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 5:2023cv00674
Petitioner:
Gabriel Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
