Cases 31 - 40 of 94
GAINEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04918
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD GAINEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAINEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79764
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GAINEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gainey v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00570
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics, LLC, Biomet, Inc. and Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Gainey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Denorris Andrews, et al v. Secretary, Department of VA, et al
as 20-10849
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, KAREN C. GAINEY, individually and GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA, on Behalf of the Georgia General Assembly
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENORRIS ANDREWS and JAMES ANDREWS, c/o Clarence Andrews, Ward
BRUST et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03251
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARSHALL, TIMMIE JONES, JOHN GAINEY and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FULLER et al v. OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2019cv01697
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CORIZON HEALTH, EDMONDS and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN THOMAS, COREY SMITH, BRIAN CASEY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAINEY v. BRASSEUR
as 3:2019cv01699
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MATTHEW GAINEY
Defendant:
D BRASSEUR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Rex Gainey v. Richard Austin
as 19-10179
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD AUSTIN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REX GAINEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
