Cases 31 - 40 of 258
ROCHA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04771
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL ROCHA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FANN v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05416
Plaintiff:
John Paul Fann
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
VERMEULIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05270
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL VERMEULIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AMMONS v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01313
Plaintiff:
JOHN-PAUL F AMMONS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tanda Lane, et al v. Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
as 21-13747
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TANDA LANE, as administrator of the estate of John Paul Booher, PAT SULLIVAN BOOHER, JOHN BOOHER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PIEDMONT HEALTHCARE
ANCHETA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55809
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL ANCHETA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
