Cases 31 - 40 of 50
FOSTER v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv01572
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEPHEN FOSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilke v. Driggers et al (MAG+)
as 2:2019cv00349
Defendant:
Jamie Neeley, Mathew M. Baker, Tenesha Whatley and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Ayers Wilke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01727
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., McKesson Corp, and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Michael Martinez
as 18-12950
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL STEPHEN MARTINEZ
Ho v. Stephens
as 8:2018cv01669
Defendant:
Michael Stephens and Daniel Glennon
Plaintiff:
Danny K. Ho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01488
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Richardson , Michael Stephens , Norma Stanton and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. , Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp. and McKesson Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trombetta v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00382
Plaintiff:
Michael Stephen Trombetta
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. Stephens et al
as 8:2015cv02192
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Charlotte Stephens, Sonya Stephens Daies, Michael Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
STANSFIELD et al v. MINUTE MAID COMPANY et al
as 4:2014cv00290
Plaintiff:
ANDREW E STANSFIELD and MICHAEL STEPHEN MATHEWS
Defendant:
MINUTE MAID COMPANY and COCA-COLA COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEPHEN et al v. BP PLC et al
as 3:2013cv00338
Defendant:
BP PLC, BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC , BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEPHEN and ALICIA STEPHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
